http://coolmaterial.com/link-roundup/if-men-wrote-womens-magazines/
http://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/news/a18676/womens-magazines-serious-journalism/
http://honors-eng-1-05-g.heights.usd259.org/modules/locker/files/get_group_file.phtml?fid=7539798&gid=4048129
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2012/04/when-typography-speaks-louder-than-words/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_manipulation
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2ODOTxgmJgEC&pg=PA287&lpg=PA287&dq=celebrity+magazines+analysis&source=bl&ots=aWo59GzQ6Y&sig=PH_iwe6OxdQ_GRD3EBV8OEjR4-w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CFcQ6AEwB2oVChMIso6-yM_qxwIVglYaCh1_rAm3#v=onepage&q=celebrity%20magazines%20analysis&f=false
Manipulative language/imagery/layout etc in magazines, womens magazines, trash magazines, comparison between mens and womens/ womens high end and trash.
focus on audience or celebrities? manipulation of both is present. self perpetuating
theres something predatory there. i dunno. like the audience is a pack of warthogs fighting over a celebrity carcass while rupert murdoch cackles like a vulture from afar
No comments:
Post a Comment